Canada eliminates human rights watchdog that oversees companies operating abroad

Mark Carney says Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise office hasn’t been ‘effective’ since its 2019 setup

Canada is eliminating a watchdog that investigates alleged human rights violations committed by Canadian companies operating abroad, after Mark Carney said the office hadn’t been “effective” since it was set up in 2019.

The move comes as Canada faces criticism from Donald Trump’s administration over its “unacceptable” efforts to combat forced labour.

The Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (Core) was established by former prime minister Justin Trudeau’s government to investigate the use of forced labour by industry. At the time, much of the focus was on China’s use of the Uyghur ethnic minority for what critics say was forced labour. Despite years of public reports from human rights groups, Beijing disputes claims it engages in modern day slavery.

Over its six years, however, Canada’s watchdog has only launched five investigations, including against three US clothing companies with operations in the country – Ralph Lauren, Nike and Levi Strauss – as well as two mining companies: GobiMin and Dynasty Gold Corp.

In all cases, the allegations centered on the use of forced labour in the northeastern Xinjiang region of China. The watchdog also used its mediation mechanism after Hugo Boss faced allegations that it used Uyghur forced labour. Core has only issued formal recommendations against two companies.

As part of his austerity measures, Carney has said the Liberals will review the function of various offices in the federal government and will make cuts where resources are used inefficiently.

“Part of government is to look at things and see whether or not they’re effective and try to improve it,” he said, adding the decision to cut the role was taken “a few months ago”. He said that while Canada has formal legislation to combat the issue, including the Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act , it has been “less effective” in enforcing those laws.